Change rules so Completeness proof is possible
This commit is contained in:
parent
87f413241a
commit
3620f0c781
11
tRules.tex
11
tRules.tex
@ -460,15 +460,18 @@ $\begin{array}{l}
|
|||||||
\end{array}$
|
\end{array}$
|
||||||
\\[1em]
|
\\[1em]
|
||||||
$\begin{array}{l}
|
$\begin{array}{l}
|
||||||
|
%TODO: why is dom(\Delta) subset of fv(N) a restriction. This excludes X,Y^X.Pair<X,Y>?
|
||||||
|
%TODO: we do not allow X.Pair<X,X> in the t-let (could we allow it? what about L and U being WTVs?)
|
||||||
\typerule{T-Let}\\
|
\typerule{T-Let}\\
|
||||||
\begin{array}{@{}c}
|
\begin{array}{@{}c}
|
||||||
\Delta | \Gamma \vdash \expr{t}_1 : \type{T}_1 \quad \quad
|
\Delta | \Gamma \vdash \expr{t}_1 : \type{T}_1 \quad \quad
|
||||||
\Delta \vdash \type{T}_1 <: \wcNtype{\Delta'}{N}
|
%\Delta \vdash \type{T}_1 <: \wcNtype{\Delta'}{N}
|
||||||
|
\Delta \vdash \type{T}_1 <: \wctype{\overline{\wildcard{X}{\type{U}}{\type{L}}}}{C}{\ol{X}}
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
\Delta, \Delta' | \Gamma, \expr{x} : \wcNtype{}{N} \vdash \expr{t}_2 : \type{T}_2 \quad \quad
|
\Delta, \Delta' | \Gamma, \expr{x} : \wctype{}{C}{\ol{X}} \vdash \expr{t}_2 : \type{T}_2 \quad \quad
|
||||||
\Delta, \Delta' \vdash \type{T}_2 <: \type{T} \quad \quad
|
\Delta, \Delta' \vdash \type{T}_2 <: \type{T} \quad \quad
|
||||||
\text{dom}(\Delta') \subseteq \text{fv}(\type{N}) \quad \quad
|
% \text{dom}(\Delta') \subseteq \text{fv}(\type{N}) \quad \quad
|
||||||
\Delta \vdash \type{T}, \wcNtype{\Delta'}{N} \ \ok
|
\Delta \vdash \type{T}, \wctype{\overline{\wildcard{X}{\type{U}}{\type{L}}}}{C}{\ol{X}} \ \ok
|
||||||
\\
|
\\
|
||||||
\hline
|
\hline
|
||||||
\vspace*{-0.3cm}\\
|
\vspace*{-0.3cm}\\
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user