8299441: Fix typos in some test files under core-libs component
Co-authored-by: Michael Ernst <mernst@openjdk.org> Reviewed-by: lancea
This commit is contained in:
parent
5b5552ff2a
commit
417d01ea63
test
jdk/javax
script
sql/testng/test/rowset
micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ public class GetInterfaceTest {
|
||||
ScriptEngine engine = manager.getEngineByName("nashorn");
|
||||
|
||||
if (engine == null) {
|
||||
System.out.println("Warning: No js engine engine found; test vacuously passes.");
|
||||
System.out.println("Warning: No js engine found; test vacuously passes.");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ public abstract class CommonCachedRowSetTests extends CommonRowSetTests {
|
||||
rs.updateString(2, coffee);
|
||||
rs.updateInt(5, sales);
|
||||
// MetaData should match
|
||||
try ( // Get the original original RowSet and validate that the changes
|
||||
try ( // Get the original RowSet and validate that the changes
|
||||
// are only made to the current, not the original
|
||||
ResultSet rs1 = rs.getOriginal()) {
|
||||
// MetaData should match
|
||||
@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ public abstract class CommonCachedRowSetTests extends CommonRowSetTests {
|
||||
rs.updateString(2, coffee);
|
||||
rs.updateInt(5, sales);
|
||||
// MetaData should match
|
||||
try ( // Get the original original row and validate that the changes
|
||||
try ( // Get the original row and validate that the changes
|
||||
// are only made to the current, not the original
|
||||
ResultSet rs1 = rs.getOriginalRow()) {
|
||||
// MetaData should match
|
||||
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ public class SerialDataLinkTests extends BaseTest {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Validate that a SerialDatalink that is serialized & deserialized is not equal
|
||||
* to to a SerialDatalink created using a different URL
|
||||
* to a SerialDatalink created using a different URL
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void test05() throws Exception {
|
||||
|
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
|
||||
* simple_copyLoop is surprisingly 5x slower. The array copying intrinsics
|
||||
* are very effective and a naive loop does not get optimized the same way.
|
||||
* OTOH there is no intrinsic for Arrays.fill but the naive array zeroing loop
|
||||
* *does* get optimized to something a little faster than than arraycopy.
|
||||
* *does* get optimized to something a little faster than arraycopy.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* System.arraycopy and Arrays.fill have such outstanding performance that
|
||||
* one should use them to replace handwritten loops whenever possible.
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user