8292088: C2: assert(is_OuterStripMinedLoop()) failed: invalid node class: IfTrue

Reviewed-by: roland, kvn
This commit is contained in:
Christian Hagedorn 2022-09-19 10:15:18 +00:00
parent a93cf92635
commit 471e2f12b4
4 changed files with 221 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -4100,7 +4100,20 @@ bool PhaseIdealLoop::duplicate_loop_backedge(IdealLoopTree *loop, Node_List &old
// Reorganize offset computations to lower register pressure. Mostly
// prevent loop-fallout uses of the pre-incremented trip counter (which are
// then alive with the post-incremented trip counter forcing an extra
// register move)
// register move):
//
// iv Phi iv Phi
// | |
// | AddI (+stride)
// | |
// | Opaque2 # Blocks IGVN from folding these nodes until loop opts are over.
// | ====> |
// | AddI (-stride)
// | |
// | CastII # Preserve type of iv Phi
// | |
// Outside Use Outside Use
//
void PhaseIdealLoop::reorg_offsets(IdealLoopTree *loop) {
// Perform it only for canonical counted loops.
// Loop's shape could be messed up by iteration_split_impl.

View File

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ bool Opaque1Node::cmp( const Node &n ) const {
}
//------------------------------Identity---------------------------------------
// Do NOT remove the opaque Node until no more loop ops can happen.
// Do NOT remove the opaque node until no more loop opts can happen.
Node* Opaque1Node::Identity(PhaseGVN* phase) {
if (phase->C->post_loop_opts_phase()) {
return in(1);
@ -54,6 +54,18 @@ Node* Opaque1Node::Identity(PhaseGVN* phase) {
// this kind of a Node, we'll get slightly pessimal, but correct, code. Thus
// it's OK to be slightly sloppy on optimizations here.
// Do NOT remove the opaque node until no more loop opts can happen. Opaque1
// and Opaque2 nodes are removed together in order to optimize loops away
// before macro expansion.
Node* Opaque2Node::Identity(PhaseGVN* phase) {
if (phase->C->post_loop_opts_phase()) {
return in(1);
} else {
phase->C->record_for_post_loop_opts_igvn(this);
}
return this;
}
// Do not allow value-numbering
uint Opaque2Node::hash() const { return NO_HASH; }
bool Opaque2Node::cmp( const Node &n ) const {

View File

@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ class Opaque2Node : public Node {
C->add_macro_node(this);
}
virtual int Opcode() const;
virtual const Type *bottom_type() const { return TypeInt::INT; }
virtual const Type* bottom_type() const { return TypeInt::INT; }
virtual Node* Identity(PhaseGVN* phase);
};
//------------------------------Opaque3Node------------------------------------

View File

@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2022, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/*
* @test
* @bug 8292088
* @requires vm.compiler2.enabled
* @summary Test that OuterStripMinedLoop and its CountedLoop are both removed after the removal of Opaque1 and 2 nodes
which allows the loop backedge to be optimized out.
* @run main/othervm -XX:LoopMaxUnroll=0 -Xcomp
* -XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,compiler.c2.TestRemoveSingleIterationLoop::test*
* -XX:CompileCommand=dontinline,compiler.c2.TestRemoveSingleIterationLoop::dontInline
* compiler.c2.TestRemoveSingleIterationLoop
* @run main/othervm -XX:LoopMaxUnroll=2 -Xcomp
* -XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,compiler.c2.TestRemoveSingleIterationLoop::test*
* -XX:CompileCommand=dontinline,compiler.c2.TestRemoveSingleIterationLoop::dontInline
* compiler.c2.TestRemoveSingleIterationLoop
*/
package compiler.c2;
public class TestRemoveSingleIterationLoop {
static int N = 400;
static int x = 3;
static int y = 3;
static volatile int[] iArr = new int[N];
public static void main(String[] args) {
testKnownLimit();
testUnknownLimit();
testKnownLimit2();
testFuzzer();
}
// Upper limit is known (i.e. type of iv phi for i is [-9999..499]). Unroll = 0 to trigger.
private static void testKnownLimit() {
int i = -10000;
int limit = 500;
// These two loops are only required to make sure that we only know that 'i' is 5 after the second loop after CCP.
int a = 2;
for (; a < 4; a *= 2);
for (int b = 2; b < a; b++) {
i = 5;
}
if (i < limit + 1) { // Required such that C2 knows that we are always entering the first loop.
// Loop L1
for (; i < limit; i++) {
// IV_PHI_i = iv phi of i for this loop with type:
// - Before CPP: [-10000..499]
// - After CPP: [5..499]
y = 3;
}
int j = 6;
// C2 parses the following loop as:
// Loop head
// body (where we do j--)
// Loop exit check where we already applied j--: j > i - 1
while (j > i - 1) {
// IV_PHI_j = iv phi of j for this loop with type:
// - Before CPP: [-9998..7]
j--;
iArr[23] = 3;
// At this point i = IV_PHI_i + 1 because i was incremented once more before exiting loop L1.
// In PhaseIdealLoop::reorg_offsets(), we identify such direct (pre-incremented) usages of an iv phi and
// add an Opaque2 node to prevent loop-fallout uses. This lowers the register pressure. We replace the
// direct phi usage in CmpI (annotated with types before CCP):
//
// Phi Phi (IV_PHI_i) # [-10000..499]
// | |
// | AddI (+1) # [-9999..500]
// | |
// | Opaque2 # int
// | ====> |
// | AddI (-1) # int
// | |
// | CastII # [-10000..499]
// | |
// CmpI CmpI # j > i - 1 = IV_PHI_j - 1 > CastII (actually IV_PHI_i) = [-10000..5] > [-10000..499]
//
//
// After CCP, the type of the iv phi IV_PHI_i improves to [5..499] while the type of the CastII does not
// because the Opaque2 node blocks the type update. When removing the Opaque2 node, we find that the
// loop only runs for a single time and does not take the backedge:
//
// [-10000..5] > [5..499] is false
//
// However, we only remove Opaque2 nodes in macro expansion where we also adjust the strip mined loop:
// We copy the bool node from the CountedLoopEnd to the OuterStripMinedLoopEnd node and adjust the
// loop exit check of the CountedLoopEnd in such a way that C2 is not able to prove that the loop
// is only run once. But the OuterStripMinedLoop can now be removed due to the removed Opaque2 nodes
// and we end up with a CountedLoop node that is strip mined but has no OuterStripMined loop. This
// results in an assertion failure later when reshaping the graph.
}
}
}
// Upper limit is not known (i.e. type of iv phi for i is [-9999..max-1]). Unroll = 0 to trigger.
private static void testUnknownLimit() {
int i = -10000;
int limit = x;
// These two loops are required to make sure that we only know after CCP that 'i' is 1 after the second loop.
int a = 2;
for (; a < 4; a *= 2);
for (int b = 2; b < a; b++) {
i = 0;
}
if (i + 1 < limit) {
i++;
for (; i < limit; i++) {
y = 3;
}
int t = 2;
while (t > i - 1) {
t--;
iArr[23] = 3;
}
}
}
// Upper limit is known. Unroll = 2 to trigger.
static int testKnownLimit2() {
int i = -10000, j;
int[][] iArr1 = new int[N][N];
// These two loops are required to make sure that we only know after CCP that 'i' is 1 after the second loop.
int a = 2;
for (; a < 4; a *= 2);
for (int b = 2; b < a; b++) {
i = 1;
}
while (++i < 318) {
dontInline();
}
for (j = 6; j > i; j--) {
// Type of i before CCP: -9999..317
// Type of i after CCP: 2..317
iArr[1] = 25327;
}
// This loop is required to trigger the assertion failure.
for (int y = 0; y < iArr1.length; y++) {
dontInline(iArr1[2]);
}
return i;
}
// Reduced original fuzzer test. Unroll = 2 to trigger.
static int testFuzzer() {
int i = 1, j, iArr1[][] = new int[N][N];
while (++i < 318) {
dontInline();
for (j = 5; j > i; j--) {
iArr[1] = 25327;
}
}
// Some more code that is required to trigger the assertion failure.
for (int y = 0; y < iArr1.length; y++) {
dontInline(iArr1[2]);
}
return i;
}
static void dontInline() {}
static void dontInline(int[] iArr) {}
}