8155824: JDK build should tune down small apps more aggressively
Reviewed-by: erikj
This commit is contained in:
parent
0dc92a6e8c
commit
7eb46a2e0f
@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ AC_DEFUN_ONCE([BOOTJDK_SETUP_BOOT_JDK_ARGUMENTS],
|
||||
ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-XX:+UseSerialGC],boot_jdk_jvmargs_small,[$JAVA])
|
||||
ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-Xms32M],boot_jdk_jvmargs_small,[$JAVA])
|
||||
ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-Xmx512M],boot_jdk_jvmargs_small,[$JAVA])
|
||||
ADD_JVM_ARG_IF_OK([-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1],boot_jdk_jvmargs_small,[$JAVA])
|
||||
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT([$boot_jdk_jvmargs_small])
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -5070,7 +5070,7 @@ VS_SDK_PLATFORM_NAME_2013=
|
||||
#CUSTOM_AUTOCONF_INCLUDE
|
||||
|
||||
# Do not change or remove the following line, it is needed for consistency checks:
|
||||
DATE_WHEN_GENERATED=1462194239
|
||||
DATE_WHEN_GENERATED=1462204427
|
||||
|
||||
###############################################################################
|
||||
#
|
||||
@ -64282,6 +64282,21 @@ $as_echo_n "checking flags for boot jdk java command for small workloads... " >&
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
$ECHO "Check if jvm arg is ok: -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1" >&5
|
||||
$ECHO "Command: $JAVA -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -version" >&5
|
||||
OUTPUT=`$JAVA -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -version 2>&1`
|
||||
FOUND_WARN=`$ECHO "$OUTPUT" | grep -i warn`
|
||||
FOUND_VERSION=`$ECHO $OUTPUT | grep " version \""`
|
||||
if test "x$FOUND_VERSION" != x && test "x$FOUND_WARN" = x; then
|
||||
boot_jdk_jvmargs_small="$boot_jdk_jvmargs_small -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1"
|
||||
JVM_ARG_OK=true
|
||||
else
|
||||
$ECHO "Arg failed:" >&5
|
||||
$ECHO "$OUTPUT" >&5
|
||||
JVM_ARG_OK=false
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $boot_jdk_jvmargs_small" >&5
|
||||
$as_echo "$boot_jdk_jvmargs_small" >&6; }
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user