8330253: Remove verify_consistent_lock_order

Co-authored-by: Patricio Chilano Mateo <pchilanomate@openjdk.org>
Reviewed-by: dcubed, pchilanomate, dnsimon
This commit is contained in:
Axel Boldt-Christmas 2024-04-29 17:14:09 +00:00
parent 4e4229438a
commit 9b423a8509
3 changed files with 0 additions and 70 deletions

View File

@ -391,7 +391,6 @@ static void restore_eliminated_locks(JavaThread* thread, GrowableArray<compiledV
#ifndef PRODUCT
bool first = true;
#endif // !PRODUCT
DEBUG_ONLY(GrowableArray<oop> lock_order{0};)
// Start locking from outermost/oldest frame
for (int i = (chunk->length() - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
compiledVFrame* cvf = chunk->at(i);
@ -401,13 +400,6 @@ static void restore_eliminated_locks(JavaThread* thread, GrowableArray<compiledV
bool relocked = Deoptimization::relock_objects(thread, monitors, deoptee_thread, deoptee,
exec_mode, realloc_failures);
deoptimized_objects = deoptimized_objects || relocked;
#ifdef ASSERT
if (LockingMode == LM_LIGHTWEIGHT && !realloc_failures) {
for (MonitorInfo* mi : *monitors) {
lock_order.push(mi->owner());
}
}
#endif // ASSERT
#ifndef PRODUCT
if (PrintDeoptimizationDetails) {
ResourceMark rm;
@ -439,11 +431,6 @@ static void restore_eliminated_locks(JavaThread* thread, GrowableArray<compiledV
#endif // !PRODUCT
}
}
#ifdef ASSERT
if (LockingMode == LM_LIGHTWEIGHT && !realloc_failures) {
deoptee_thread->lock_stack().verify_consistent_lock_order(lock_order, exec_mode != Deoptimization::Unpack_none);
}
#endif // ASSERT
}
// Deoptimize objects, that is reallocate and relock them, just before they escape through JVMTI.

View File

@ -103,60 +103,6 @@ void LockStack::verify(const char* msg) const {
}
#endif
#ifdef ASSERT
void LockStack::verify_consistent_lock_order(GrowableArray<oop>& lock_order, bool leaf_frame) const {
int top_index = to_index(_top);
int lock_index = lock_order.length();
if (!leaf_frame) {
// If the lock_order is not from the leaf frame we must search
// for the top_index which fits with the most recent fast_locked
// objects in the lock stack.
while (lock_index-- > 0) {
const oop obj = lock_order.at(lock_index);
if (contains(obj)) {
for (int index = 0; index < top_index; index++) {
if (_base[index] == obj) {
// Found top index
top_index = index + 1;
break;
}
}
if (VM_Version::supports_recursive_lightweight_locking()) {
// With recursive looks there may be more of the same object
while (lock_index-- > 0 && lock_order.at(lock_index) == obj) {
top_index++;
}
assert(top_index <= to_index(_top), "too many obj in lock_order");
}
break;
}
}
lock_index = lock_order.length();
}
while (lock_index-- > 0) {
const oop obj = lock_order.at(lock_index);
const markWord mark = obj->mark_acquire();
assert(obj->is_locked(), "must be locked");
if (top_index > 0 && obj == _base[top_index - 1]) {
assert(mark.is_fast_locked() || mark.monitor()->is_owner_anonymous(),
"must be fast_locked or inflated by other thread");
top_index--;
} else {
assert(!mark.is_fast_locked(), "must be inflated");
assert(mark.monitor()->owner_raw() == get_thread() ||
(!leaf_frame && get_thread()->current_waiting_monitor() == mark.monitor()),
"must be owned by (or waited on by) thread");
assert(!contains(obj), "must not be on lock_stack");
}
}
}
#endif
void LockStack::print_on(outputStream* st) {
for (int i = to_index(_top); (--i) >= 0;) {
st->print("LockStack[%d]: ", i);

View File

@ -121,9 +121,6 @@ public:
// Printing
void print_on(outputStream* st);
// Verify Lock Stack consistent with lock order
void verify_consistent_lock_order(GrowableArray<oop>& lock_order, bool leaf_frame) const NOT_DEBUG_RETURN;
};
#endif // SHARE_RUNTIME_LOCKSTACK_HPP