stan/jdk-24
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

6810698: G1: two small bugs in the sparse remembered sets

Browse Source 
The _expanded flag of the sparse RSets is not reset and this can leave a RSet in an inconsistent state if it is expanded more than once. Also, we should be iterating over the _cur, instead of the _next, sparse table

Reviewed-by: apetrusenko, iveresov
This commit is contained in:
Antonios Printezis 2009-03-07 11:07:36 -05:00
parent 416d70bf91
commit e7d899910b
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/g1/sparsePRT.cpp
View File

@ -504,6 +504,7 @@ void SparsePRT::cleanup() {
// Make sure that the current and next tables agree. (Another mechanism
// takes care of deleting now-unused tables.)
_cur = _next;
set_expanded(false);
}
void SparsePRT::expand() {

4
hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/g1/sparsePRT.hpp
View File

@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ public:
// Clean up all tables on the expanded list. Called single threaded.
static void cleanup_all();
RSHashTable* next() const { return _next; }
RSHashTable* cur() const { return _cur; }
void init_iterator(SparsePRTIter* sprt_iter);
@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ public:
{}
void init(const SparsePRT* sprt) {
RSHashTableIter::init(sprt->next());
RSHashTableIter::init(sprt->cur());
}
bool has_next(size_t& card_index) {
return RSHashTableIter::has_next(card_index);