/* * Copyright (c) 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. * * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as * published by the Free Software Foundation. * * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that * accompanied this code). * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. * * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any * questions. */ /* * @test * @bug 8315248 * @summary AssertionError in Name.compareTo * @modules jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.util * * @run main TestNameTables */ import java.io.PrintStream; import java.util.List; import java.util.Objects; import com.sun.tools.javac.util.Context; import com.sun.tools.javac.util.Name; import com.sun.tools.javac.util.Names; import com.sun.tools.javac.util.Options; /** * Tests that CharSequence.compareTo works on CharSequence objects that may * come from different name tables. * * While the java.util.Name class generally specifies that operations involving * multiple Name objects should use names from the same table, that restriction * is harder to specify when the names are widened CharSequence objects. * * The test can be extended if necessary to cover other methods on Name, * if the restrictions on Name are relaxed to permit more mix-and-match usages. */ public class TestNameTables { public static void main(String... args) { new TestNameTables().run(); } public static final String USE_SHARED_TABLE = "useSharedTable"; public static final String USE_UNSHARED_TABLE = "useUnsharedTable"; public static final String USE_STRING_TABLE = "useStringTable"; public final List ALL_TABLES = List.of(USE_SHARED_TABLE, USE_UNSHARED_TABLE, USE_STRING_TABLE); private final PrintStream out = System.err; void run() { for (var s : ALL_TABLES) { test(createNameTable(s)); } for (var s1 : ALL_TABLES) { for (var s2 : ALL_TABLES) { test(createNameTable(s1), createNameTable(s2)); } } } Name.Table createNameTable(String option) { Context c = new Context(); Options o = Options.instance(c); o.put(option, "true"); Names n = new Names(c); return n.table; } /** * Tests operations using a single name table. * * @param table the name table */ void test(Name.Table table) { test(table, table); } /** * Tests operations using distinct name tables, of either the same * or different impl types. * * @param table1 the first name table * @param table2 the second name table */ void test(Name.Table table1, Name.Table table2) { if (table1 == table2) { out.println("Testing " + table1); } else { out.println("Testing " + table1 + " : " + table2); } // tests are primarily that there are no issues manipulating names from // distinct name tables testCharSequenceCompare(table1, table2); } void testCharSequenceCompare(Name.Table table1, Name.Table table2) { Name n1 = table1.fromString("abc"); Name n2 = table2.fromString("abc"); checkEquals(CharSequence.compare(n1, n2), 0, "CharSequence.compare"); } void checkEquals(Object found, Object expect, String op) { if (!Objects.equals(found, expect)) { out.println("Failed: " + op); out.println(" found: " + found); out.println(" expect: " + expect); } } }