3789983e89
Reviewed-by: darcy, ihse
123 lines
6.0 KiB
Java
123 lines
6.0 KiB
Java
/*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2014, 2016, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|
|
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
|
|
*
|
|
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
|
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
*
|
|
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
|
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
|
|
* accompanied this code).
|
|
*
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
|
|
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
|
|
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
|
|
*
|
|
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
|
|
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
|
|
* questions.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @test
|
|
* @bug 8031320
|
|
* @summary Verify UseRTMForStackLocks option processing on CPU with
|
|
* rtm support when VM supports rtm locking.
|
|
* @library /test/lib /
|
|
* @modules java.base/jdk.internal.misc
|
|
* java.management
|
|
* @requires vm.flavor == "server" & !vm.emulatedClient & vm.rtm.cpu & vm.rtm.os
|
|
* @build sun.hotspot.WhiteBox
|
|
* @run driver ClassFileInstaller sun.hotspot.WhiteBox
|
|
* sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission
|
|
* @run main/othervm -Xbootclasspath/a:. -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions
|
|
* -XX:+WhiteBoxAPI
|
|
* compiler.rtm.cli.TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
package compiler.rtm.cli;
|
|
|
|
import jdk.test.lib.process.ExitCode;
|
|
import jdk.test.lib.cli.CommandLineOptionTest;
|
|
|
|
public class TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig {
|
|
private static final String DEFAULT_VALUE = "false";
|
|
|
|
public void runTestCases() throws Throwable {
|
|
String errorMessage
|
|
= CommandLineOptionTest.getExperimentalOptionErrorMessage(
|
|
"UseRTMForStackLocks");
|
|
String warningMessage
|
|
= RTMGenericCommandLineOptionTest.RTM_FOR_STACK_LOCKS_WARNING;
|
|
|
|
String shouldFailMessage = " VM option 'UseRTMForStackLocks' is "
|
|
+ "experimental%nJVM startup should fail without "
|
|
+ "-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions flag";
|
|
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.verifySameJVMStartup(
|
|
new String[] { errorMessage }, null, shouldFailMessage,
|
|
shouldFailMessage + "%nError message expected", ExitCode.FAIL,
|
|
"-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks");
|
|
String shouldPassMessage = " VM option 'UseRTMForStackLocks'"
|
|
+ " is experimental%nJVM startup should pass with "
|
|
+ "-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions flag";
|
|
// verify that we get a warning when trying to use rtm for stack
|
|
// lock, but not using rtm locking.
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.verifySameJVMStartup(
|
|
new String[] { warningMessage }, null, shouldPassMessage,
|
|
"There should be warning when trying to use rtm for stack "
|
|
+ "lock, but not using rtm locking", ExitCode.OK,
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
|
|
"-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks",
|
|
"-XX:-UseRTMLocking");
|
|
// verify that we don't get a warning when no using rtm for stack
|
|
// lock and not using rtm locking.
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.verifySameJVMStartup(null,
|
|
new String[] { warningMessage }, shouldPassMessage,
|
|
"There should not be any warning when use both "
|
|
+ "-XX:-UseRTMForStackLocks and -XX:-UseRTMLocking "
|
|
+ "flags",
|
|
ExitCode.OK,
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
|
|
"-XX:-UseRTMForStackLocks",
|
|
"-XX:-UseRTMLocking");
|
|
// verify that we don't get a warning when using rtm for stack
|
|
// lock and using rtm locking.
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.verifySameJVMStartup(null,
|
|
new String[] { warningMessage }, shouldPassMessage,
|
|
"There should not be any warning when use both "
|
|
+ "-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks and -XX:+UseRTMLocking"
|
|
+ " flags",
|
|
ExitCode.OK,
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
|
|
"-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks",
|
|
"-XX:+UseRTMLocking");
|
|
// verify that default value if false
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.verifyOptionValueForSameVM("UseRTMForStackLocks",
|
|
TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig.DEFAULT_VALUE,
|
|
"Default value of option 'UseRTMForStackLocks' should be false",
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS);
|
|
// verify that default value is false even with +UseRTMLocking
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.verifyOptionValueForSameVM("UseRTMForStackLocks",
|
|
TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig.DEFAULT_VALUE,
|
|
"Default value of option 'UseRTMForStackLocks' should be false",
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
|
|
"-XX:+UseRTMLocking");
|
|
// verify that we can turn the option on
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.verifyOptionValueForSameVM("UseRTMForStackLocks",
|
|
"true", "Value of option 'UseRTMForStackLocks' should "
|
|
+ "be able to be set as 'true' when both "
|
|
+ "-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks and "
|
|
+ "-XX:+UseRTMLocking flags used",
|
|
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
|
|
"-XX:+UseRTMLocking", "-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
|
|
new TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig().runTestCases();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|