jdk-24/test/jdk/java/lang/Thread/virtual/CancelTimerWithContention.java
Patricio Chilano Mateo 78b80150e0 8338383: Implement JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without Pinning
Co-authored-by: Patricio Chilano Mateo <pchilanomate@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Alan Bateman <alanb@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Haley <aph@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Fei Yang <fyang@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Coleen Phillimore <coleenp@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Richard Reingruber <rrich@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Martin Doerr <mdoerr@openjdk.org>
Reviewed-by: aboldtch, dholmes, coleenp, fbredberg, dlong, sspitsyn
2024-11-12 15:23:48 +00:00

104 lines
3.6 KiB
Java

/*
* Copyright (c) 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/*
* @test
* @summary Test cancelling a timeout task for Object.wait(millis) when there is
* contention on the timer queue
* @requires vm.continuations
* @key randomness
* @run main/othervm
* -Djdk.virtualThreadScheduler.parallelism=2
* -Djdk.virtualThreadScheduler.timerQueues=1
* CancelTimerWithContention
*/
import java.time.Instant;
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
public class CancelTimerWithContention {
// number of threads
private static final int MIN_THREADS = 100;
private static final int MAX_THREADS = 10_000;
// number of monitors to enter
private static final int MIN_MONITORS = 2;
private static final int MAX_MONITORS = 8;
private static final Random RAND = new Random();
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (int threadCount = MIN_THREADS; threadCount <= MAX_THREADS; threadCount += 100) {
System.out.format("%s #threads = %d%n", Instant.now(), threadCount);
for (int lockCount = MIN_MONITORS; lockCount <= MAX_MONITORS; lockCount += 2) {
test(threadCount, lockCount);
}
}
}
/**
* Test threads entering monitors and using Object.wait(millis) to wait. This
* testing scenario leads to a mix of contention (with responsible threads using
* short timeouts), timed-wait, and cancellation of timer tasks. This scenario
* can result in contention of the timer queue.
*/
static void test(int threadCount, int monitorCount) {
var locks = new Object[monitorCount];
for (int i = 0; i < monitorCount; i++) {
locks[i] = new Object();
}
try (var executor = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor()) {
var finished = new AtomicInteger();
for (int i = 0; i < threadCount; i++) {
Object lock = locks[RAND.nextInt(monitorCount)]; // random lock
executor.submit(() -> {
synchronized (lock) {
lock.wait(Long.MAX_VALUE);
}
finished.incrementAndGet();
return null;
});
synchronized (lock) {
lock.notify();
}
}
// notify at most one thread until all threads are finished
while (finished.get() < threadCount) {
for (Object lock : locks) {
synchronized (lock) {
lock.notify();
}
}
}
}
}
}