d72810794b
Reviewed-by: amenkov, kevinw
165 lines
6.1 KiB
Java
165 lines
6.1 KiB
Java
/*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2023, 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|
|
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
|
|
*
|
|
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
|
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
*
|
|
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
|
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
|
|
* accompanied this code).
|
|
*
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
|
|
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
|
|
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
|
|
*
|
|
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
|
|
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
|
|
* questions.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @test
|
|
* @bug 8297638
|
|
* @summary JDI memory leak when creating and destroying many threads
|
|
*
|
|
* @comment Don't allow -Xcomp or -Xint as they impact memory useage and number of iterations.
|
|
* Require compressed oops because not doing so increases memory usage.
|
|
* @requires (vm.compMode == "Xmixed") & vm.opt.final.UseCompressedOops
|
|
* @run build TestScaffold VMConnection TargetListener TargetAdapter
|
|
* @run compile -g ThreadMemoryLeakTest.java
|
|
* @comment run with -Xmx7m so any leak will quickly produce OOME
|
|
* @run main/othervm -Xmx7m ThreadMemoryLeakTest
|
|
*/
|
|
import com.sun.jdi.*;
|
|
import com.sun.jdi.event.*;
|
|
import com.sun.jdi.request.*;
|
|
|
|
import java.util.*;
|
|
|
|
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
|
|
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
|
|
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
|
|
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadFactory;
|
|
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.LongAdder;
|
|
|
|
/********** target program **********/
|
|
|
|
class ThreadMemoryLeakTarg {
|
|
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
|
|
System.out.println("Howdy!");
|
|
Semaphore semaphore = new Semaphore(500);
|
|
LongAdder adder = new LongAdder();
|
|
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
|
|
int iterations = 0;
|
|
// Run for 100 seconds
|
|
while (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime < 100 * 1000) {
|
|
iterations++;
|
|
semaphore.acquire();
|
|
DebuggeeWrapper.newThread(() -> {
|
|
adder.increment();
|
|
long sum = adder.sum();
|
|
if ((sum % 1000) == 0) {
|
|
System.out.println("Progress: " + sum);
|
|
}
|
|
try {
|
|
// Virtual thread creation tends to overwhelm the debugger,
|
|
// leading to high memory use for all the unprocessed events
|
|
// that get queued up, so we need to slow it down a bit more
|
|
// than we do for platform threads to avoid getting OOME.
|
|
long timeToSleep = DebuggeeWrapper.isVirtual() ? 100 : 50;
|
|
Thread.sleep(timeToSleep);
|
|
}
|
|
catch (InterruptedException e) {
|
|
throw new RuntimeException(e);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
semaphore.release();
|
|
}
|
|
}).start();
|
|
}
|
|
System.out.println("Goodbye from ThreadMemoryLeakTarg after " + iterations + " iterations!");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/********** test program **********/
|
|
|
|
public class ThreadMemoryLeakTest extends TestScaffold {
|
|
StepRequest stepRequest = null;
|
|
EventRequestManager erm;
|
|
boolean mainIsDead;
|
|
|
|
ThreadMemoryLeakTest (String args[]) {
|
|
super(args);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
|
|
new ThreadMemoryLeakTest(args).startTests();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/********** event handlers **********/
|
|
|
|
static LongAdder threadStartCount = new LongAdder();
|
|
static LongAdder threadDeathCount = new LongAdder();
|
|
|
|
public void threadStarted(ThreadStartEvent event) {
|
|
threadStartCount.increment();
|
|
if ((threadStartCount.sum() % 1000) == 0) {
|
|
println("Got ThreadStartEvent #" + threadStartCount +
|
|
" threads:" + (threadStartCount.sum() - threadDeathCount.sum()));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public void threadDied(ThreadDeathEvent event) {
|
|
threadDeathCount.increment();
|
|
if ((threadDeathCount.sum() % 1000) == 0) {
|
|
println("Got ThreadDeathEvent #" + threadDeathCount +
|
|
" threads:" + (threadStartCount.sum() - threadDeathCount.sum()));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public void vmDied(VMDeathEvent event) {
|
|
println("Got VMDeathEvent");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public void vmDisconnected(VMDisconnectEvent event) {
|
|
println("Got VMDisconnectEvent");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/********** test core **********/
|
|
|
|
protected void runTests() throws Exception {
|
|
/*
|
|
* Launch debuggee and break at main() method.
|
|
*/
|
|
BreakpointEvent bpe = startToMain("ThreadMemoryLeakTarg");
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Setup ThreadStart and ThreadDeath event requests. Note, SUSPEND_NONE is important
|
|
* for this test. Otherwise the memory leak described in 8297638 is not triggered.
|
|
* There can't be any events coming in that might result in a suspend since the
|
|
* resume will clear out the leak.
|
|
*/
|
|
erm = vm().eventRequestManager();
|
|
ThreadStartRequest tsrReq = erm.createThreadStartRequest();
|
|
ThreadDeathRequest tdrReq = erm.createThreadDeathRequest();
|
|
tsrReq.setSuspendPolicy(EventRequest.SUSPEND_NONE);
|
|
tdrReq.setSuspendPolicy(EventRequest.SUSPEND_NONE);
|
|
tsrReq.enable();
|
|
tdrReq.enable();
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Resume the target and listen for events
|
|
*/
|
|
listenUntilVMDisconnect();
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Any test failure will result in an exception or a timeout. So if we
|
|
* get here we passed.
|
|
*/
|
|
println("ThreadMemoryLeakTest: PASSED");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|