147 lines
7.3 KiB
C++
147 lines
7.3 KiB
C++
/*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2016, 2024, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|
|
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
|
|
*
|
|
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
|
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
*
|
|
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
|
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
|
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
|
|
* accompanied this code).
|
|
*
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
|
|
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
|
|
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
|
|
*
|
|
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
|
|
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
|
|
* questions.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include "precompiled.hpp"
|
|
#include "jvm.h"
|
|
#include "logging/logLevel.hpp"
|
|
#include "logging/logSelectionList.hpp"
|
|
#include "logging/logTagSet.hpp"
|
|
#include "utilities/globalDefinitions.hpp"
|
|
#include "logTestUtils.inline.hpp"
|
|
#include "unittest.hpp"
|
|
|
|
TEST(LogSelectionList, combination_limit) {
|
|
size_t max_combinations = LogSelectionList::MaxSelections;
|
|
EXPECT_GT(max_combinations, LogTagSet::ntagsets())
|
|
<< "Combination limit not sufficient for configuring all available tag sets";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(LogSelectionList, parse) {
|
|
char buf[256];
|
|
const char* valid_expression[] = {
|
|
"logging=off,all", "gc,logging", "logging+gc", "logging+gc,gc", "gc=trace,logging=info",
|
|
"logging+gc=trace,gc+logging=warning,logging", "gc,all=info"
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Verify valid expressions parse without problems
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_expression); i++) {
|
|
LogSelectionList expr;
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(expr.parse(valid_expression[i])) << "Valid expression '" << valid_expression[i] << "' did not parse";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Verify invalid expressions do not parse
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_expression); i++) {
|
|
for (size_t j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(invalid_selection_substr); j++) {
|
|
// Prefix with invalid substr
|
|
LogSelectionList expr;
|
|
jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s%s", invalid_selection_substr[j], valid_expression[i]);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(expr.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal";
|
|
|
|
// Suffix with invalid substr
|
|
LogSelectionList expr1;
|
|
jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s%s", valid_expression[i], invalid_selection_substr[j]);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(expr1.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal";
|
|
|
|
// Use only the invalid substr
|
|
LogSelectionList expr2;
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(expr2.parse(invalid_selection_substr[j])) << "'" << invalid_selection_substr[j] << "'" << " considered legal";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Suffix/prefix with some unique invalid prefixes/suffixes
|
|
LogSelectionList expr;
|
|
jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "*%s", valid_expression[i]);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(expr.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal";
|
|
|
|
LogSelectionList expr1;
|
|
jio_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "logging*%s", valid_expression[i]);
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(expr1.parse(buf)) << "'" << buf << "'" << " considered legal";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test the level_for() function for an empty expression
|
|
TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_empty) {
|
|
LogSelectionList emptyexpr;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(emptyexpr.parse(""));
|
|
// All tagsets should be unspecified since the expression doesn't involve any tagset
|
|
for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != nullptr; ts = ts->next()) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Unspecified, emptyexpr.level_for(*ts));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test level_for() with an expression that has overlap (last subexpression should be used)
|
|
TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_overlap) {
|
|
LogSelectionList overlapexpr;
|
|
// The all=warning will be overridden with gc=info and/or logging+safepoint*=trace
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(overlapexpr.parse("all=warning,gc=info,logging+safepoint*=trace"));
|
|
for (LogTagSet* ts = LogTagSet::first(); ts != nullptr; ts = ts->next()) {
|
|
if (ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(gc)) && ts->ntags() == 1) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Info, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts));
|
|
} else if (ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(logging)) && ts->contains(PREFIX_LOG_TAG(safepoint))) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts));
|
|
} else {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, overlapexpr.level_for(*ts));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Info, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, safepoint)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace,
|
|
overlapexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc, class, safepoint, heap)>::tagset()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test level_for() with an expression containing two independent subexpressions
|
|
TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_disjoint) {
|
|
LogSelectionList reducedexpr;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(reducedexpr.parse("gc+logging=trace,class*=error"));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint, class)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::NotMentioned, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, reducedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test level_for() with an expression that is completely overridden in the last part of the expression
|
|
TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_override) {
|
|
LogSelectionList overrideexpr;
|
|
// No matter what, everything should be set to error level because of the last part
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(overrideexpr.parse("logging,gc*=trace,all=error"));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(class)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Error, overrideexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test level_for() with a mixed expression with a bit of everything
|
|
TEST(LogSelectionList, level_for_mixed) {
|
|
LogSelectionList mixedexpr;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(mixedexpr.parse("all=warning,gc*=debug,gc=trace,safepoint*=off"));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Warning, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, class)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Debug, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc, class)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Off, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc, safepoint, logging)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Off, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(safepoint)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Debug, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(logging, gc)>::tagset()));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(LogLevel::Trace, mixedexpr.level_for(LogTagSetMapping<LOG_TAGS(gc)>::tagset()));
|
|
}
|