jdk-24/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/loopopts/TestSinkingDivisorLostPin.java

86 lines
3.9 KiB
Java

/*
* Copyright (c) 2021, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/*
* @test
* @key stress randomness
* @bug 8274074
* @requires vm.compiler2.enabled
* @summary Sinking a data node used as divisor of a DivI node into a zero check UCT loses its pin outside the loop due to
* optimizing the CastII node away, resulting in a div by zero crash (SIGFPE) due to letting the DivI node floating
* back inside the loop.
* @run main/othervm -Xcomp -XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,compiler.loopopts.TestSinkingDivisorLostPin::* -XX:-TieredCompilation
* -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+StressGCM -XX:StressSeed=4177789702 compiler.loopopts.TestSinkingDivisorLostPin
* @run main/othervm -Xcomp -XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,compiler.loopopts.TestSinkingDivisorLostPin::* -XX:-TieredCompilation
* -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+StressGCM compiler.loopopts.TestSinkingDivisorLostPin
*/
package compiler.loopopts;
public class TestSinkingDivisorLostPin {
static int iFld = 1;
static int x = 1;
static int q = 0;
static int iArrFld[] = new int[100];
public static void main(String[] strArr) {
test();
}
static void test() {
int y = 1;
int i = 1;
do {
int j;
for (j = 1; j < 88; j++) {
iArrFld[1] = x;
}
try {
y = iFld - q; // y = 1 - 0
y = (iArrFld[2] / y); // y = iArrFld[2] / 1
// Zero check Z1 with UCT
// DivI node D on IfTrue path of zero check
y = (5 / iFld); // y = 5 / 1
// Zero check Z2 with UCT
// DivI node D is only used on IfFalse path of zero check Z2 into UCT (on IfTrue path, the result is not used anywhere
// because we directly overwrite it again with "y = (5 / iFld)). The IfFalse path of the zero check, however, is never
// taken because iFld = 1. But before applying the sinking algorithm, the DivI node D could be executed during the
// loop, as the zero check Z1 succeeds. Only after sinking the SubI node for "iFld - q" into the IfFalse path of Z2
// and optimizing it accordingly (iFld is found to be zero because the zero check Z2 failed, i.e. iFld is zero which is
// propagated into the CastII node whose type is improved to [0,0] and the node is replaced by constant zero), the
// DivI node must NOT be executed inside the loop anymore. But the DivI node is executed in the loop because of losing
// the CastII pin. The fix is to update the control input of the DivI node to the get_ctrl() input outside the loop
// (IfFalse of zero check Z2).
} catch (ArithmeticException a_e) {
}
iFld -= 8;
if (y == 3) {
}
i++;
} while (i < 10);
}
}